Monday, August 11, 2008

The Real Conspiracy Of Anwar Being Framed Again !!!!!!!!!


ONLINE MEDIA STATEMENT
===============




We would like to convey the following:

1. As we have said before, Anwar Ibrahim has been framed by Dr Mahathir and his cohorts. It began with Mohd Ezam Mohd Nor.

2. Ezam went to see Dr Mahathir and had asked his opinion on how did he framed Anwar with the sodomy charge in 1998. After hearing what Dr Mahathir had said, he asked Dr Mahathir whether he could do the same thing to Anwar again. Dr Mahathir said go ahead. Thus, Dr Mahathir had endorsed Ezam's plan to frame Anwar with the newly concocted sodomy frame-up.

3. Shafee Abdullah was Dr Mahathir's cohort who also did the same groundwork for him in 1998 to frame Anwar. So, Ezam went to seek Shafee's help, of course with Dr Mahathir's consent, to frame Anwar again.

4. Then, Ezam conspired with Saiful and Mohd Rodwan to come out with the plan to accuse Anwar of sodomizing Saiful. Of course, the PDRM and the AG's office are also in this conspiracy.

5. So, Abdullah Haji Ahmad Badawi and Mohd Najib Tun Abdul Razak were totally not involved in this latest frame-up of Anwar Ibrahim. Only Dr Mahathir and his cohorts are. Period.

End Statement.

Best Regards.........

We Condemn The Bar Council & Are Very Angry At Them

The Malaysian Insider:

Pas opposes Bar council's 'Conversion to Islam' forum

KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 7 - Pas said today the party is opposing "in the strongest terms" the plan by the Bar Council to organise a forum on 'Conversion to Islam' scheduled to take place on Saturday.

Pas President Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang said if the Bar Council proceed with the forum, it could give rise to suspicion and tension in the relations between Muslims and members of other faiths, as well as undermining the country's harmony, which would not be beneficial to anyone.

Link: Click here for more details.........

Our Comment:

1. Some of the lawyers in the Bar Council think that they are smart and experts in law. So, they are indirectly trying to question and test the Syariah laws and its provisions in the Constitution of Malaysia. They think that Islamic matters pertaining to religious conversion, inheritance, marriage, etc. can be addressed by the civil courts.

2. We condemn these lawyers for their abusive and irresponsible acts for holding the forum. We are very angry at them for not being sensitive and considerate enough to the feelings, sentiments and norms of the Muslims in Malaysia. Because of this handful of lawyers, the Bar Council's reputation has been tarnished.

3. All Islamic matters shall be addressed in the Syariah courts. The civil courts do not have jurisdiction over these matters as specified in the Constitution of Malaysia.

4. The Bar Council should have conducted the forum in a different approach instead based on an inter-faith dialogue like the one mooted by the King of Saudi Arabia in Spain recently.

5. We do not mind if Islam and Islamic issues are discussed among experts in this way for the masses to see and participate. This approach will bring more good to the people rather than adverse effects.

Best Regards.........